Just how important is building secure software today? Well, given the never-ending string of cyberattacks that succeed by taking advantage of software vulnerabilities, it’s become essential for organizations to purchase and use only the safest software.
Consider some examples of software vulnerabilities gone wrong, of which we have no shortage:
Not only can customers suffer grave damage from vulnerable software; regulators increasingly hold software developers accountable for poor development practices. The Securities and Exchange Commission and the Federal Trade Commission, for example, have both sanctioned software firms for making rosy promises about their software development practices when the truth was nothing of the sort.
This article will discuss best practices and frameworks for building secure software and how to identify and respond to vulnerabilities early in the development process when it costs less and is more effective. In addition, we’ll highlight expert-developed resources you can leverage for your own security software development effort.
Secure software development is a methodology (often associated with DevSecOps) for creating software that incorporates security into every phase of the software development life cycle (SDLC). Security is baked into the code from inception rather than addressed after testing reveals critical product flaws. Security becomes part of the planning phase, incorporated long before a single line of code is written.
Traditionally, security is viewed as an impediment to innovation and creativity by developers that creates delays in getting the product to market. This thinking hurts a business’s bottom line, as it’s six times more costly to fix a bug during implementation and 15 times more expensive during testing than to fix the same bug during design.
Most importantly, how happy will customers be with the cool new features of an application if the product is laden with vulnerabilities for hackers to exploit? Security deserves a preeminent position in the software engineering process today, and organizations must do so to find themselves able to compete.
So, how can security become part of the SDLC from the beginning?
First, testing early and often. A secure software development philosophy stresses employing static and dynamic security testing throughout the development process. Second, development teams should also document software security requirements alongside the functional requirements. Finally, conducting risk analysis during design can be beneficial in helping you identify potential environmental threats.
Organizations looking to offer secure software must lay the foundation for success by effectively preparing their people, processes, and technology for this challenge. Proper preparation takes the form of a well-constructed secure software development policy, which every organization committed to building secure software needs.
A secure software development policy is a set of guidelines detailing the practices and procedures an organization should follow to decrease the risk of vulnerabilities during software development. In addition, the policy should provide detailed instructions on viewing, assessing, and demonstrating security through each phase of the SDLC, including risk management approaches.
Secure software development policy must establish rules for your people. Team members must clearly understand their duties, receive thorough training, and undergo strict employee screening. Instituting segregation of duties ensures no one person has total control or knowledge of a project. Testing protocols need to assess all employee work in order to ensure acceptable standards.
Secure software development policy must also discuss the necessary processes for protecting software. One of the most critical — separation of development, testing, and operational environments — breeds autonomy while preventing test bias and unauthorized code changes. Access control, another essential process, assures that employees can only access job-relevant data. Finally, version control is a helpful process to track all sources and times of code alteration.
The first tech-related action step in a secure software development policy should create the governing rules for programming languages and coding. Coding languages can contain numerous vulnerabilities, so developers must be well-schooled on the hardening strategies that minimize attack routes. A secure software development policy should also provide instructions on establishing secure repositories to manage and store code.
Not only is a secure software development policy recommended — it’s also mandatory in certain instances. For example, organizations adhering to SOC 2® or ISO 27001 standards for cybersecurity must have a secure development policy. Your team can build your policy from scratch or use resources like the ISO 27001 template guide.
What should your organization keep in mind when creating a secure software development policy? Dave Brennan, Vice President of Engineering at Hyperproof, weighs in with some advice:
“You need to take a lot of different approaches. Start by understanding what’s happening in the industry and what the risks are. Next, train your engineering team to be aware of common threats and vulnerabilities, the necessary processes to follow, and the tools to run. Finally, use checklists to ensure your policies and procedures are up-to-date and monitor these monthly. It’s not just one approach that’s going to keep your software secure — you’re going to need all of them.”
Dave Brennan, Vice President of Engineering at Hyperproof
Many organizations benefit from aligning their practices with a well-established framework, such as NIST’s Secure Software Development Framework (SSDF). Organizations such as OWASP and SAFEcode have created a collection of foundational secure software development resources that discuss software security in detail, supplying the necessary guidance to reduce the number, lessen the impact, and prevent future vulnerabilities in software releases.
Let’s take a moment to examine the NIST framework recommended secure software development processes, which NIST organizes into four stages:
Each practice is defined with the following elements:
The following sections provide a more in-depth explanation of NIST’s four secure software development processes.
This process begins by clearly defining both internal (e.g., Policies, risk management strategies) and external (e.g., Laws, regulations) software development security requirements for your organization. SSDF roles are assigned, and teams prepare with role-specific training. Supporting tools are engaged to improve speed and efficiency across the SDLC, then security checks are installed to ensure software meets organizational standards.
Tasks include identifying, communicating, and maintaining all security requirements over time. Training regimes are prepared, management support is engaged, and tools are selected. Finally, benchmarks are defined to document the achievement of set security standards.
Protecting the code and ensuring software integrity until it reaches the end customer is paramount. This process focuses on safeguarding code from unauthorized access and tampering, verifying the software’s integrity, and protecting the software after release.
A primary task is storing code based on the least-privilege principle to ensure only authorized access. Also, a copy of every release with listed components and integrity verification information is provided to every customer.
As you can imagine, this process includes many steps and involves numerous actors and practices. First, the software is designed and reviewed to align with identified security requirements. Next, third parties are thoroughly evaluated for compliance with these requirements. Then, developers use security best practices to write code, configuring the build process around boosting product security. All code is then reviewed, analyzed, and tested, employing manual and automated means to uncover vulnerabilities and ensure compliance. Finally, the software is configured with secure default settings for protection out-of-the-box, and trusted components are often reused in production.
Specific tasks include creating a trusted component list, using threat modeling to assess risk, studying external security requirements, communicating standards to third parties while verifying their compliance, using secure coding best practices while employing top industry tools, and examining code from all angles through review or analysis. Final tasks include designing and performing vulnerability tests, documenting the results, and fixing all discovered issues.
Another important task, which some may consider above and beyond, is setting secure defaults, ensuring they align with other platform security features, then explaining their importance to administrators.
Finding vulnerabilities is only part of a security professional’s job — the other critical component is remediation. This final process focuses on correcting current vulnerabilities and gathering data for future prevention. Once identified and confirmed, vulnerabilities must be expediently prioritized and fixed. Speed is essential in reducing the window of opportunity threat actors have to launch attacks. Additionally, it’s beneficial to analyze a vulnerability’s cause once mitigated to help prevent future occurrences.
Tasks in this final process include gathering customer information and diligently reviewing/testing code for any undiscovered flaws, preparing a team, plan, and processes for rapid vulnerability response and mitigation, creating and implementing a remediation plan for each identified vulnerability, and determining the root causes to construct a knowledge base for future prevention.
In addition, root causes should be analyzed over time to identify patterns. These patterns then can be spotted and remediated in other software. Finally, the entire SDLC can be periodically updated to eliminate similar issues in future releases.
In today’s constantly expanding threat environment, developing secure software is undoubtedly challenging, but it couldn’t be more critical as more and more successful software-linked attacks grab headlines. So, we compiled a list of ten secure software development best practices to help build the safest software and keep your organization from becoming a software cyberattack statistic. So, here they are — our top ten software security development best practices:
Before creating a single line of code, begin planning how to integrate security into every phase of the SDLC. Engage the power of automation in testing and monitoring vulnerabilities from day one. Security needs to be baked into your culture and code, and there’s no better place to start than in the earliest development phase.
This will provide a guideline for preparing your people, processes, and technology to perform secure software development. This formal policy supplies specific instructions for approaching and instrumenting security in each phase of the SDLC. In addition, it provides the governing rules and defines roles to help your people, processes, and tools minimize the vulnerability risk in software production.
A proven framework like NIST SSDF will add structure and consistency to your team’s effort to adhere to secure software best practices. Frameworks can help answer the “What do we do next?” question and benefit all new software developers.
Clearly define all security requirements, then train developers to write code in alignment with these parameters using only secure coding practices. Ensure all your third-party vendors are aware of your security requirements and demonstrate compliance, as they can provide an easy pathway for an attack.
Keep all code in secure repositories, allowing only authorized access to prevent tampering. Strictly regulate all contact with the code, monitor changes, and closely oversee the code signing process to preserve integrity.
Breakaway from the traditional development pattern of testing code toward the end of the SDLC. Instead, use both developer reviews and automated testing to continually examine code for flaws. Catching vulnerabilities early in the life cycle saves money and time while preventing developer frustration later on.
Vulnerabilities are a fact of life in software development. It’s not if they occur, but when, so be ready with a team, plan, and processes in place to address incidents in real-time. Remember, the faster you can identify and respond to vulnerabilities the better, shortening the window of opportunity for exploitation.
Many customers remain vulnerable simply for lack of knowledge of their new software’s functions. This added customer service touch ensures the consumer will be protected in the early stages of adoption.
There are many moving parts to track and monitor during secure software development. Help your team by using action checklists at periodic intervals such as weekly or monthly meetings to ensure all necessary security policies and procedures are current and functional.
Wise software developers study vulnerabilities — learning their root causes, spotting patterns, preventing repeat occurrences, and updating their SDLC with improved knowledge. They also watch trends and stay up-to-date on best practices. Dave Brennan offers some parting advice here, “The big picture is knowing and staying current on the industry and best practices. The space is always evolving; security best practice approaches aren’t standing still. So no matter what you’re doing with security, it’s critical to look ahead to see what’s coming, keep learning, and identify better ways to secure your software development process.”
One of the most challenging parts of maintaining information security is that people often don’t follow through and complete their assigned tasks. Unfortunately, these human errors are most often at the heart of security problems. As organizations grow their technology footprint and evolve their business processes, security and compliance professionals need platforms that give them the ability to define security requirements, document and assign security tasks, monitor whether people perform tasks on time, and maintain accountability.
Hyperproof is built as a project management and accountability system for security and compliance leaders. In Hyperproof, it’s easy to implement best-in-class security and privacy frameworks, such as the NIST SSDF, the NIST Cybersecurity Framework, ISO 27001, or SOC 2, and distribute security tasks to engineers, IT professionals, and other system administrators while testing and monitoring the effectiveness of controls over time.
With Hyperproof, it’s easy to see who’s responsible for performing certain security/compliance tasks and if those tasks are completed. In addition, Hyperproof can be configured to automatically collect proof that security review tasks have been performed (and configurations are correct) from different cloud-based systems and developer tools. This allows security and compliance managers to focus on strategic tasks, such as evaluating the effectiveness of specific controls, instead of gathering evidence manually. To learn more about Hyperproof, sign up for a personal demo.
